top of page
  • LinkedIn

The Site Whisperers: Why Coordinators Are the MVPs of Clinical Trials (and What Happens When You Actually Listen to Them)

  • Matt Kibby
  • Apr 6
  • 3 min read

Updated: May 5



Runs the whole trial. Recognized by few. Basically the Batman of clinical research.
Runs the whole trial. Recognized by few. Basically the Batman of clinical research.

VanaVerse Dispatch #003


Every clinical trial has a launch strategy, a recruitment plan, a set of dazzling dashboards. But the quiet heartbeat of every trial? That’s the site coordinator.

They’re not on the posters. They’re not in the press releases. But they’re the reason anything works.


Welcome to Dispatch #003, where we lift the veil, roll up our sleeves, and give site staff the standing ovation they’ve deserved since Day 1.


Coordinators don’t get enough credit. So we’re giving them credit and power.


They are:

  • Educators

  • Confidants

  • Protocol interpreters

  • Schedulers, troubleshooters, emotional anchors


They juggle ten systems, three time zones, and a thousand questions – while making it look like no big deal. Except it is a big deal. And the industry has been making one big mistake for years:


Building recruitment strategies without asking the people who actually implement them.


They are, in every meaningful way, the Invisible Investigators – doing the real work that determines whether a trial succeeds or stalls. They are more critical to success than the visible investigators whose names appear on the documentation. And yet, in site selection questionnaires used by CROs and sponsors, coordinators are rarely – if ever – mentioned. Not a single question. Not a single check box. Nothing.


It’s baffling.


The disconnect is real.


You know the drill. A global campaign goes live. Sites receive materials and are told to “distribute them.” No one asks if the messaging aligns with what they know about their patients. No one checks if the workflows actually work. And then everyone’s surprised when performance lags.


At ClinVana, we don’t guess what sites need. We ask. We listen. We co-create. We build communications and materials that actually help coordinators do their jobs – not add friction to them.


Why? Because they are the gatekeepers of momentum.


When a patient has a question, it’s not a chatbot they turn to – it’s the coordinator. When there's confusion about eligibility, it’s the coordinator who clarifies. When a patient considers dropping out, it’s the coordinator who can turn the tide.


Coordinators aren’t just involved. They’re instrumental. And if your strategy isn’t designed to serve them as well as patients, it’s built on unstable ground.


What does it mean to actually support sites?


It means:

  • Materials that are easy to explain, share, and personalize

  • Messaging that reflects the conversations coordinators are already having

  • Systems that make their lives easier, not harder

  • Listening to feedback not as criticism – but as field intelligence


We make this happen through Zengage – our engagement toolkit designed not only for participants, but for site personnel too. Because they deserve to feel supported, empowered, and equipped with tools that respect their time and expertise.


And through Zenlighten, we track what’s working in the real world – at the site level – and adjust accordingly. Because when we listen to coordinators, we learn. And when we learn, we improve.


So what happens when you actually listen to site coordinators?


You don’t just get better data. You get better decisions. You get momentum. You get trust. And you get something rare in clinical trials:


You get alignment.


Site coordinators aren’t whisperers. They’re leaders. It’s time we built strategies that follow their lead.


Welcome to the VanaVerse.


Let’s make some noise for the quiet heroes.


 
 
 

Commentaires


bottom of page